36
          
        
        
          
            |
          
        
        
          
            cerecdoctors.com
          
        
        
          
            |
          
        
        
          
            quarter 4
          
        
        
          
            |
          
        
        
          
            2012
          
        
        
          BL4, to increase the value
        
        
          of the patient’s teeth (Fig.
        
        
          3).
        
        
          The waxed-up model
        
        
          of the full upper arch was
        
        
          digitally impressed using
        
        
          the Biogeneric Copy mode. Because both
        
        
          are equally effective, an alternative tech-
        
        
          nique would have been to place a small
        
        
          amount of Bisacryl into a matrix of the
        
        
          wax-up and create a mock-up of the teeth
        
        
          before scanning the mock-up directly for
        
        
          use as the model copy.
        
        
          To obtain an ideal digital impression
        
        
          using CEREC technology, it was necessary
        
        
          to trough the tissue around the preparation
        
        
          (
        
        
          Fig. 4) using a diode laser (Picasso Lite
        
        
          Diode Laser, Dentsply). After the prepara-
        
        
          tions were completed, they were scanned
        
        
          into the computer with the wax-up (Fig.
        
        
          5).
        
        
          CEREC intraoral scans should be
        
        
          complete, with all the necessary detail (i.e.,
        
        
          any information required regarding adja-
        
        
          cent teeth) to fabricate successful resto-
        
        
          rations. Therefore, the digital full-arch
        
        
          impression included an accurate image of
        
        
          several teeth distal to the preparations to
        
        
          ensure the CEREC was supplied with the
        
        
          appropriate information required to either
        
        
          stitch or superimpose the wax-up over the
        
        
          preparation master model (Fig. 6). At this
        
        
          point, an alginate impression was taken
        
        
          as a try-in model to verify correct seating.
        
        
          Due to the length of the appointment, the
        
        
          patient was given a lunch break during
        
        
          which the restorations were designed.
        
        
          Removed from the CEREC MCXL
        
        
          milling machine one at a time, the resto-
        
        
          rations were tried-in on the model. All of
        
        
          milling and produce strong, esthetic resto-
        
        
          rations. Of the several materials available
        
        
          for use with CAD/CAM technology, IPS
        
        
          e.max Impulse lithium disilicate (Ivoclar
        
        
          Vivadent, Amherst, NY) was the mate-
        
        
          rial of choice for this case. IPS e.max CAD
        
        
          Impulse lithium disilicate monolithic
        
        
          glass ceramic is known for its exceptional
        
        
          strength. The lithium disilicate blocks
        
        
          boast a flexural strength of 360 MPa and
        
        
          are manufactured to tolerate high perfor-
        
        
          mance milling, as well as the antagonistic
        
        
          forces of mastication.
        
        
          8
        
        
          Lithium disilicate
        
        
          glass ceramic is a glassymatrix composedof
        
        
          70
        
        
          percent fine, needle-like crystals evenly
        
        
          distributed during the crystalline phase.
        
        
          9
        
        
          Its
        
        
          strength and construction make it perfect
        
        
          for conservative restorations such as inlays,
        
        
          onlays and, in this case, veneers.
        
        
          9
        
        
          IPS e.max
        
        
          CAD Impulse is indicated for use in the
        
        
          office or laboratory.
        
        
          9
        
        
          Versatile in its appli-
        
        
          cations, its translucent nature also renders
        
        
          it ideal for use in the anterior region due to
        
        
          its resemblance to natural dentition.
        
        
          10
        
        
          The
        
        
          availability of three translucencies (HT, LT,
        
        
          MO), three brightness values (Value 1, 2, 3),
        
        
          and two opalescent shades (Opal 1, 2), along
        
        
          with powders, stains, and glazes — which
        
        
          can be used to further develop the look of
        
        
          natural dentition and life-life optical prop-
        
        
          erties — allow the representation of a wide
        
        
          spectrumof dental esthetics.
        
        
          8
        
        
          I present a recent case inwhich CEREC
        
        
          technology helped transform a patient’s
        
        
          smile and self-confidence in just one visit.
        
        
          
            CASE PRESENTATION
          
        
        
          Brent, a 50-year-old male, presented with
        
        
          multifactorial breakdown caused by a
        
        
          history of acid reflux and parafunction (Fig.
        
        
          1).
        
        
          His “patchwork” dentistry performed
        
        
          over the years was also breaking down.
        
        
          There was no noted temporomandibular
        
        
          joint (TMJ) pathology, as it appeared that
        
        
          any interferenceswerewornaway, allowing
        
        
          his joints to seat properly. Although self-
        
        
          consciousabouthissmileforyears,hisnewly
        
        
          acquired dental-sales position required him
        
        
          to speak in front of and engage in conversa-
        
        
          tion with dentists on a daily basis. This was
        
        
          
            5
          
        
        
          
            6
          
        
        
          
            8
          
        
        
          
            Fig. 5: Once completed, the preparations
          
        
        
          
            were scanned into the computer along
          
        
        
          
            with the wax-up.
          
        
        
          
            Fig. 6: The wax-up was superimposed over
          
        
        
          
            the preparation master model.
          
        
        
          
            Fig. 7: Articulating paste was used to
          
        
        
          
            determine where the preparation was
          
        
        
          
            binding and the proper adjustments made.
          
        
        
          
            Fig. 8: The ceramist arrived to perform
          
        
        
          
            minor cutback and layering in the office.
          
        
        
          | | |
        
        
          
            H o rw i t z
          
        
        
          
            7
          
        
        
          the catalyst for restorative treatment. With
        
        
          the understanding that more treatment
        
        
          was needed to attain optimum oral health,
        
        
          restoring his self-confidence with a new
        
        
          smile was of first order.
        
        
          One week prior to his scheduled
        
        
          appointment, the patient underwent an
        
        
          initial examinationwhich included taking
        
        
          impressions for the creation of upper and
        
        
          lower models, preoperative photographs,
        
        
          a facial evaluation utilizing a facial
        
        
          analyzer (Kois Dento-facial Analyzer,
        
        
          Panadent), and a maximum intercuspa-
        
        
          tion (MI) bite registration. Upon receiving
        
        
          the records, the laboratory technician
        
        
          performed a wax-up of teeth #5 through
        
        
          #12
        
        
          onto a model that would be scanned
        
        
          into the CEREC utilizing the Biogeneric
        
        
          Copy model (Fig. 2).
        
        
          
            CLINICAL PROTOCOL
          
        
        
          The day of the appointment, the patient
        
        
          was anesthetized and the teeth were
        
        
          isolated (Optragate, Ivoclar Vivadent).
        
        
          The material of choice for this treatment
        
        
          was IPS e.max Impulse V2 blocks, shade