44
|
cerecdoctors.com
|
quarter 4
|
2012
removed and the tissue architecture was
ideal. Final impression was taken.
The temporary crown in tooth #9 was
removed, and final impression was made
for the lab technician (Fig. 8). The lab
order was to do custom abutments for
teeth #11, #13, #14 and a four-unit bridge
(
either PFZ or a CadOn bridge), and a
single e.max crown in #9. The case was
sent to Jay Black, CDT, owner of Winter
Spring Dental Lab in Winter Springs, Fla.
After pouring the impression, with his
inEOS Blue, Jay scanned the model with
the scan bodies attached to the Tibase
of each implant replica (Figs. 9-12). The
inLab software 4.0.1 allowed the lab tech-
nician to know exactly where the implants
were located (Fig. 13), and also has a tool
to remove the gingival mask and design
the custom abutment for perfection and
precision (Fig. 14). Incoris Mezo blocks
were milled, adjusted and put through the
sintering process (Figs. 15-16). The techni-
cian double-scanned the case — now with
| | |
M e l e n d e z
Fig 8: After six months of healing and
excellent home care, the tissue was very
healthy. Final impressions were taken.
Fig 9: Case was poured and the titanium
base placed in position. The scan bodies
are located over the tibase of the implants,
ready to be scanned with the in EOS Blue.
Fig. 10: inLab 4.01 Administration Phase.
Selecting the custom abutment position
and the e.max crown to be milled.
Fig. 11: Case already scanned with EOS Blue.
Fig. 12: Precision of a great impression.
Details for successful proposal.
Fig. 13: Designing for custom abutments for
implant in areas of #11, #13 and #14.
Fig. 14: Design completed, ready to mill in
a inCoris Mezo block.
Fig. 15: All the custom abutments milled
and ready for adjustment and sintering.
Fig. 16: Customabutments finished and in
position. Verifying interocclusal clearance.
Fig. 17: The CDT sets the insertion axis for the
design of the four-unit bridge framework.
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17