18
|
cerecdoctors.com
|
quarter 2
|
2013
Summary
CAD/CAM technologies have widened
the materials available for dentistry,
having an ability to mimic the optical
characteristics of enamel and dentin. In
the case of ceramics, we can add their
excellent biocompatibility and chemical
durability as well. Clinical data for all-
ceramic systems is becoming increas-
ingly available, and results exist for many
commercial materials, providing guid-
ance regarding clinical indications. Resin-
based systems as either laboratory-fabri-
cated or factory-produced restorations
perform clinically no better than direct
resin-based composites curing intra-
orally. Ceramic restorations represent the
best long-term solution for CAD/CAM
patients and the only single-unit or multi-
unit FDP solution.
For questions and more information,
Dr. Kelly can be reached at
kelly@nso1.uchu.edu
.
REFERENCES
1 Weinstein M, Weinstein LK, Katz S and Weinstein
A. Fused Porcelain-to-Metal Teeth. US Patent n.
3,052,982, 1962.
2 Kelly JR. Ceramics in restorative and prosthetic den-
tistry. Annu Rev Mater Sci 1997; 27:443-68.
3 Giordano R. A comparison of all-ceramic restorative
systems: Part 2. Gen Dent 2000; 48:38-40, 43-45.
4 LeBlanc J-C, Guérin T, Noël L, Calamassi-Tran G,
Volatier J-C, Verger P. Dietary exposure estimates of
18 elements from the 1st French total diet study. Food
Additives and Contaminants, 2005;22(7):624-641.
5 McLean JW, Hughes TH. The reinforcement of dental
porcelain with ceramic oxides. Br Dent J 1965;
119:251-67.
6 Andersson M, Odén A. A new all-ceramic crown.
A dense-sintered, high-purity alumina coping with
porcelain. Acta Odontol Scand 1993; 51:59-64.
7 Raigrodski AJ. Clinical and laboratory considerations
for the use of CAD/CAMY-TZP-based restorations.
Pract Proced Aesthet Dent 2003; 15:469-76.
8 Heffernan MJ, Aquilino SA, Diaz-Arnold AM et al.
Relative translucency of six all-ceramic systems. Part
I: core materials. J Prosthet Dent 2002; 88:4-9.
9 Heffernan MJ, Aquilino SA, Diaz-Arnold AM et al.
Relative translucency of six all-ceramic systems. Part
II: core and veneer materials. J Prosthet Dent 2002;
88:10-15.
10 Filser FT. Direct ceramic machining of dental restora-
tions. Zurich: Swiss Federal Institute of Technology
Zurich; 2001. PhD thesis.
11 Filser F, Kocher P, Gauckler LJ. Net-shaping of
ceramic components by direct ceramic machining.
Assembly Autom 2003; 23(4):382–90.
12 Denry I, Kelly JR. State of the art of zirconia for dental
applications. Dent Mater 2008; 24:299-307.
| | |
k e l ly
13 Kelly JR, Denry I. Stabilized zirconia as a structural
ceramic: an overview. Dent Mater 2008; 24(3):289-98.
14 Denry IL. Recent advances in ceramics for dentistry.
Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 1996; 7:134-43.
15 Swain MV. Unstable cracking (chipping) of veneering
porcelain on all-ceramic dental crowns and fixed
partial dentures. Acta Biomaterialia 2009; 5:1668-1677.
16 Tholey MJ, Swain MV, Thiel N. SEM observations of
porcelain Y-TZP interface. Dent Mater 2009; 25:857-
62.
17 Kim JM, Covel NS, Guess PC, Rekow ED, Zhang Y.
Concerns of Hydrothermal Degradation in CAD/CAM
Zirconia. J Dent Res 2010; 89:91-95.
18 Kobayashi K, Kuwajima H, Masaki T. Phase change
and mechanical properties of ZrO2-Y2O3 solid elec-
trolyte after aging. Solid State Ionics 1981; 3-4:489–93.
19 Kelly JR. Dental ceramics: current thinking and
trends. Dent Clin N Am 2004; 48:513-530.
20 Probster L (1993). Survival rate of In-Ceram restora-
tions. Int J Prosthodont 6:259-63.
21 Pang SE. A report of anterior In-Ceram restorations.
Ann Acad Med Singapore 1995;24:33-37.
22 Probster L. Four-year clinical study of glass-infiltrated,
sintered alumina crowns. J Oral Rehab 1996;23:147-51.
23 Scotti R, Catapano S, D’Elia A. A clinical evaluation of
In-Ceram crowns. Int J Prosthodont 1995;8:320-3.
24 McLaren EA, White SN. Survival of In-Ceram crowns
in a private practice: a prospective clinical trial.
J Prosthet Dent 2000;83:216-22.
25 Scherrer SS, De Rijk WG, Wiskott HW, Belser UC.
Incidence of fractures and lifetime predictions of
all-ceramic crown systems using censored data. Am J
Dent 2001;14:72-80.
26 Segal BS. Retrospective assessment of 546 all-ceramic
anterior and posterior crowns in a general practice.
J Prosthet Dent 2001;85:544-50.
27 Bindl A, Mörmann WH. An up to 5-year clinical evalu-
ation of posterior in-ceram CAD/CAM core crowns.
Int J Prosthodont 2002;15:451-6.
28 Fradaeni M, Aquilano A, Corrado M. Clinical experi-
ence with In-Ceram Spinell crowns: 5-year follow-up.
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2002;22:525-33.
29 Bindl A, MörmannWH. Survival rate of mono-ceramic
and ceramic-core CAD/CAM-generated anterior
crowns over 2-5 years. Eur J Oral Sci 2004;112:197-204.
30 Oden A, Andersson M, Krystek-Ondracek I,
Magnusson D. Five-year clinical evaluation of Procera
AllCeram crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1998;80:450-56.
31 Odman P, Andersson B. Procera AllCeram crowns fol-
lowed for 5 to 10.5 years: a prospective clinical study.
Int j Prosthodont 2001;14:504-509.
32 Fradeani M, D'Amelio M, Redemagni M, Corrado M.
Five-year follow-up with Procera all-ceramic crowns.
Quintessence Int 2005;36:105-13.
33 Walter MH, Wolf BH, Wolf AE, Boening KW. Six-year
clinical performance of all-ceramic crowns with
alumina cores. Int J Prosthodont 2006;19:162-3.
34 Zitzmann NU, Galindo ML, Hagmann E, Marinello
CP. Clinical evaluation of Procera AllCeram crowns in
the anterior and posterior regions. Int J Prosthodont
2007;20:239-41.
35 Lehner C, Studer S, Brodbeck U, Schärer P. Short-
term results of IPS-Empress full-porcelain crowns.
J Prosthodont 1997;6:20-30.
36 Fradeani M, Aquilano A. Clinical experience with
Empress crowns. Int J Prosthodont 1997;10:241-7.
37 Sorensen JA, Choi C, Fanuscu MI, Mito WT. IPS Em-
press crown system: three-year clinical trial results. J
Calif Dent Assoc 1998;26:130-6.
38 Sjögren G, Lantto R, Granberg A, Sundström BO,
Tillberg A. Clinical examination of leucite-reinforced
glass-ceramic crowns (Empress) in general practice:
a retrospective study. Int J Prosthodont 1999;12:122-8.
39 Fradeani M, Redemagni M. An 11-year clinical evalu-
ation of leucite-reinforced glass-ceramic crowns: a
retrospective study. Quintessence Int 2002;33:503-10.
40 Toksavul S, Toman M. A short-term clinical evalu-
ation of IPS Empress 2 crowns. Int J Prosthodont
2007;20:168-72.
41 Marquardt P, Strub JR. Survival rates of IPS empress
2 all-ceramic crowns and fixed partial dentures:
results of a 5-year prospective clinical study. Quintes-
sence Int 2006;37:253-9.
42 Taskonak B, Sertgöz A. Two-year clinical evaluation
of lithia-disilicate-based all-ceramic crowns and fixed
partial dentures. Dent Mater 2006;22:1008-13
43 Suputtamongkol K, Anusavice KJ, Suchatlampong C,
Sithiamnuai P, Tulapornchai C. Clinical performance
and wear characteristics of veneered lithia-disilicate-
based ceramic crowns. Dent Mater 2008;24:667-73.
44 Sjögren G, Lantto R, Tillberg A. Clinical evaluation of
all-ceramic crowns (Dicor) in general practice.
J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:277-84.
45 Haselton DR, Diaz-Arnold AM, Hillis SL. Clinical
assessment of high-strength all-ceramic crowns.
J Prosthet Dent 2000;83:396-401.
46 Sorensen JA, Kang SK, Torres TJ, Knode H. In-Ceram
fixed partial dentures: three-year clinical trial results.
J Calif Dent Assoc 1998;26:207-14.
47 Vult von Steyern P, Jönsson O, Nilner K. Five-year
evaluation of posterior all-ceramic three-unit
(In-Ceram) FPDs. Int J Prosthodont 2001;14:379-84.
48 Olsson KG, Furst B, Andersson B, Carlsson GE. A long-
term retrospective and clinical follow-up study of In-
CeramAlumina FPDs. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16:150-6.
49 Kern M. Clinical long-term survival of two-retainer
and single-retainer all-ceramic resin-bonded fixed
partial dentures. Quintessence Int 2005;36:141-7.
50 Esquivel-Upshaw JF, Anusavice KJ, Young H, Jones
J, Gibbs C. Clinical performance of a lithia disilicate-
based core ceramic for three-unit posterior FPDs.
Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:469-75.
51 Suárez MJ, Lozano JF, Paz Salido M, Martínez F.
Three-year clinical evaluation of In-Ceram Zirconia
posterior FPDs. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:35-8.
52 Sailer I, Fehér A, Filser F, Gauckler LJ, Lüthy H,
Hämmerle CH. Five-year clinical results of zirconia
frameworks for posterior fixed partial dentures.
Int J Prosthodont 2007;20(4):383-388.
53 ISO 6872
54 Koczarski MJ. Utilization of ceromer inlays/onlays for
replacement of amalgam restorations. Pract Periodon-
tics Aesthet Dent. 1998 May;10(4):405-12.
55 Jackson RD. Indirect resin inlay and onlay restora-
tions: a comprehensive clinical overview. Pract
Periodontics Aesthet Dent. 1999 Oct;11(8):891-900.
56 Miara P. Aesthetic guidelines for second-generation
indirect inlay and onlay composite restorations. Pract
Periodontics Aesthet Dent. 1998 May;10(4):423-31.
57 Chalifoux PR. Treatment considerations for posterior
laboratory-fabricated composite resin restorations.
Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent. 1998 Oct;10(8):969-78.
58 Leinfelder KF. Indirect posterior composite resins.
Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2005 Jul;26(7):495-503.
59 Wassell RW, Walls AWG, McCabe JF. Direct compos-
ite inlays versus conventional composite restorations:
5-year follow-up. J Dent 2000;28:375-382.
60 van Dijken JWV. Direct resin composite inlays/onlays:
an 11 year follow-up. J Dent 2000;28:299-306.
61 Sousa ROA, Özcan M, Michida SMA et al. Conversion
degree of indirect composites and effect of thermo-
cycling on the physical properties. J Prosthodont
2010;19:218-225.
62 Ferracane JL. Current trends in dental composites.
Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 1995;6(4):302-318.
63 Vanoorbeek S, Vandamme K, Lijnen I, Naert I.
Computer-aided designed/computer-assisted manu-
factured composite resin versu ceramic single-tooth
restorations: A 3-year clinical study. Int J Prosthodont
2010;23(3):223-230.
1...,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21 23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,...74