Page 45 - CEREC Q4 | 2014

QUARTER 4 | 2014 | CERECDOCTORS.COM | 43
After an uneventful healing period
of two months, the screw-retained
provisional restoration was removed,
revealing an ideally preserved gingival
architecture, which corresponded to
an ideal per-implant soft-tissue profile
(Figs. 16-17). At this time, a Sirona Scan-
post and Scanbody was once again
inserted on the implant to obtain a final
digital impression with the CEREC
Omnicam (Fig. 18). A split file restora-
tion was then designed in the CEREC
Chairside software following the same
restorative contours as the two previous
restorative designs (Figs. 19-20), and
an Ivoclar Vivadent IPS e.max Hybrid-
Abutment block (Fig. 21) was utilized
to mill an e.max custom abutment,
which was crystallized, polished and
bonded to the corresponding Sirona
TiBase (Fig. 22).
The final e.max custom abutment was
Fig. 37: Preoperative CBCT Implant
treatment plan for site #9
Fig. 38: Postoperative CBCT scan after
two months of undisturbed healing
30
33
35
36
38
34
37
31
32
sent to the patient’s restorative dentist
for fabrication of the final cement-
retained implant restoration.
CASE EXAMPLE USING TELIO CAD
PMMA ABUTMENT BLOCK
This patient is a 62-year-oldmale patient
who was referred after a complete hori-
zontal fracture of tooth #8 rendered
this tooth restoratively hopeless (Figs.
23-24). The diagnostic, surgical and
restorative workflow and procedures
were exactly the same as described
above for the previous case example
(Figs. 25-31).
In this case, however, the newly
introduced Ivoclar Vivadent Telio CAD